Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 82.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 14 |
| 2023-11-14 | -- |
| 6.48 x 2.97 x 0.34 inches | -- |
| 7.23 ounces | -- |
| Black, Red and White | -- |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 516 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| 3000 cd/m2 brightness | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.4 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| processor | processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 6.3 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.76 | 12.54 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5100mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.88 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| -- | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S25 is better than vivo iQOO 12 Pro, having a general score of 82.6 against 71.5. Samsung Galaxy S25 is a extremely thinner and notably lighter phone than vivo iQOO 12 Pro. Both of these phones work with the same Android 14 OS (Operating System), so you shouldn't perceive any difference in that aspect.
Vivo iQOO 12 Pro counts with a slightly better screen than Galaxy S25, because it has a quite more brightness, a little bit larger display, a just a little greater pixel count per inch in the screen and a better 1440 x 3200 resolution. The vivo iQOO 12 Pro has a way bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy S25, because it has more internal storage.
The vivo iQOO 12 Pro features a little faster processing unit than Galaxy S25, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the vivo iQOO 12 Pro also has a greater amount of RAM memory. The vivo iQOO 12 Pro shoots just a bit better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy S25, and although they both have a back facing camera with a 50 mega pixels, the same video quality and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the vivo iQOO 12 Pro also has a bigger camera sensor taking higher quality videos and pictures and a larger aperture to take better captures and videos in low light situations.
Vivo iQOO 12 Pro counts with superior battery duration than Samsung Galaxy S25, because it has 5100mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.