Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 4.4.2 |
| 2023-11-14 | 2014-06-23 |
| 6.48 x 2.97 x 0.34 inches | 5.67 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Black, Red and White | Blue and Red |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 516 pixels per inch | 432 pixels per inch |
| 3000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 10.4 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974-AC chipset |
| processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 16 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 6.72 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.76 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | SIM |
| 7 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5100mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2800mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| -- | 390 hours standby time 21 hours talk time |
| 6.88 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 4.0, EDR |
| -- | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport is a bit better than the vivo iQOO 12 Pro, with a 77.8 score against 71.5. Both of these phones use Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport has newer 4.4.2 version while vivo iQOO 12 Pro has Android 14, so it counts with some additional features. The Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport is a incredibly older and just a bit thicker cellphone than the vivo iQOO 12 Pro, but Samsung could make it much lighter anyway.
The Galaxy S5 Sport features a much better processing power than vivo iQOO 12 Pro, because although it has lesser RAM and 4 lesser CPU cores , it also counts with an additional GPU. Vivo iQOO 12 Pro counts with a more vivid screen than Galaxy S5 Sport, because it has a much larger screen, a much higher resolution of 1440 x 3200 pixels and a little bit more pixels per inch in the screen.
The vivo iQOO 12 Pro features a very superior camera than Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport, because it has a lot larger back-facing camera sensor, a way larger camera aperture to take better low light photos and video, a way better 7680x4320 video definition and a back camera with lot more mega pixels. The vivo iQOO 12 Pro features a way bigger storage to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory capacity.
The vivo iQOO 12 Pro has a really longer battery duration than Galaxy S5 Sport, because it has an 82 percent more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.