Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2023-11-14 | 2016-06-10 |
| 6.48 x 2.97 x 0.34 inches | 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Black, Red and White | Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 247.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 516 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| 3000 cd/m2 brightness | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.4 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 6.3 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.76 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G | HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5100mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.88 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| -- | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S7 Active has a score of 75.8, which is slightly better than vivo iQOO 12 Pro's overall score of 71.5. The Galaxy S7 Active construction is just a bit lighter than vivo iQOO 12 Pro, although it's thicker and was released 8 years before. The vivo iQOO 12 Pro counts with a brighter display than Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has a bit worse pixel amount per inch of screen, it also counts with much more brightness, a little higher 1440 x 3200 resolution and a much larger screen.
The Samsung Galaxy S7 Active features a really superior processing power than vivo iQOO 12 Pro, although it has lesser RAM memory and 4 lesser processing cores (but faster). Vivo iQOO 12 Pro captures much better photographs and videos than Galaxy S7 Active, and although they both have a same size aperture, the vivo iQOO 12 Pro also has a lot more megapixels camera in the back and a way higher video definition.
Vivo iQOO 12 Pro features a much bigger storage capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with more internal memory. The vivo iQOO 12 Pro has superior battery duration than Galaxy S7 Active, because it has 5100mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.