Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 78.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2023-11-14 | 2016-03-11 |
| 6.48 x 2.97 x 0.34 inches | 5.94 x 2.86 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Black, Red and White | Black, Black pearl, Coral blue, Gold, Pink gold, Silver and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 336.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 516 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| 3000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.4 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.76 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5100mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.88 | 5.6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| -- | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S7 edge has a score of 78.1, which is a little bit better than vivo iQOO 12 Pro's general score of 71.5. The Samsung Galaxy S7 edge is an older cellphone than the vivo iQOO 12 Pro, but Samsung was able to make it lighter and thinner anyway. Both of these phones have Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy S7 edge has the newer 8.0 Oreo version while vivo iQOO 12 Pro has Android 14 version.
Vivo iQOO 12 Pro features a much more vibrant display than Galaxy S7 edge, because although it has a quite lower amount of pixels per display inch, it also counts with a larger display and a quite better 1440 x 3200 resolution. The vivo iQOO 12 Pro has a way bigger storage to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy S7 edge, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 224 GB more internal memory.
Samsung Galaxy S7 edge has a much greater processing power than vivo iQOO 12 Pro, although it has a lower number of cores (but faster) and a lower amount of RAM memory. The vivo iQOO 12 Pro counts with a superior battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy S7 edge, because it has a 5100mAh battery capacity.
Vivo iQOO 12 Pro counts with a lot better camera than Samsung Galaxy S7 edge, and although they both have a F1.7 diafragm aperture, the vivo iQOO 12 Pro also has a much better video definition, a much larger back camera sensor which offers a lot higher photo and video quality and a camera in the back with a much better 50 mega-pixels resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.