Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 81.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2023-11-14 | 2017-04-21 |
| 6.48 x 2.97 x 0.34 inches | 5.86 x 2.68 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 5.47 ounces |
| Black, Red and White | Arctic silver, Burgundy red, Coral blue, Maple gold, Midnight black, Orchid gray and Rose pink |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 173.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 516 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| 3000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.4 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.76 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5100mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.88 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| -- | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S8 has a general score of 81.7, which is much better than vivo iQOO 12 Pro's general score of 71.5. The Samsung Galaxy S8 is an noticeably older cellphone than vivo iQOO 12 Pro, but it is a lot lighter and a little bit thinner anyway. Vivo iQOO 12 Pro features a more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy S8, because although it has a little worse pixels density, it also counts with a bigger display and a slightly higher 1440 x 3200 pixels resolution.
The vivo iQOO 12 Pro has a superior memory to store more games and applications than Galaxy S8, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity. Galaxy S8 has a much better processing power than vivo iQOO 12 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 cores.
Vivo iQOO 12 Pro shoots much better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy S8, and although they both have the same aperture, the vivo iQOO 12 Pro also has a much larger back-facing camera sensor which offers a much better photo and video quality, a much higher 7680x4320 video definition and a camera in the back with a way higher resolution.
Vivo iQOO 12 Pro has a superior battery life than Galaxy S8, because it has a 5100mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.