Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2023-11-14 | 2020-04-04 |
| 6.48 x 2.97 x 0.34 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| Black, Red and White | Black |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | -- |
| 516 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| 3000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.4 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.76 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5100mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.88 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| -- | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro is much better than vivo iQOO 12 Pro, getting an 80.1 score against 71.5. Both devices in our current comparison use Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has 8.0 Oreo version and vivo iQOO 12 Pro has Android 14. Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro's construction is extremely older, noticeably thicker and somewhat heavier than the vivo iQOO 12 Pro.
The vivo iQOO 12 Pro has a brighter display than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a little less pixels per display inch, it also counts with a lot bigger display and a little bit higher resolution of 1440 x 3200 pixels. Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a much faster processor than vivo iQOO 12 Pro, although it has lesser RAM, they both have 8 processing cores.
The vivo iQOO 12 Pro features a better storage to install games and applications than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with more internal storage. The vivo iQOO 12 Pro counts with just a bit longer battery lifetime than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because it has a 5100mAh battery capacity against 4500mAh.
Vivo iQOO 12 Pro shoots much clearer videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not so good for capturing photographs and/or video in poorly lited situations, it also counts with a way bigger camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors, a way higher 7680x4320 video definition and a back facing camera with a way higher resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.