Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2023-11-14 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.48 x 2.97 x 0.34 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Black, Red and White | Black |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 516 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| 3000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.76 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5100mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.88 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| -- | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy XCover Pro has an overall score of 81, which is better than vivo iQOO 12 Pro's 71.5 score. Both phones we compare here include Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy XCover Pro has the older 11 version and vivo iQOO 12 Pro has Android 14. Although the Galaxy XCover Pro is better than the vivo iQOO 12 Pro, we must tell that it's also incredibly older, just a bit heavier and somewhat thicker.
Vivo iQOO 12 Pro counts with a much better looking display than Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has a quite larger display, a higher number of pixels per inch in the display and a higher 1440 x 3200 resolution. The vivo iQOO 12 Pro has a better storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with more internal memory.
Galaxy XCover Pro counts with a much powerful processing unit than vivo iQOO 12 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores. The vivo iQOO 12 Pro has longer battery performance than Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has a 5100mAh battery size. The vivo iQOO 12 Pro features a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have a F1.7 aperture, the vivo iQOO 12 Pro also has a lot higher video quality, a camera with a lot better resolution and a way larger back-facing camera sensor shooting lot better quality pictures and videos.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.