Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 92.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2023-11-14 | 2020-08-07 |
| 6.48 x 2.97 x 0.34 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black, Red and White | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white |
| -- | Aluminum |
| -- | $ 603.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 516 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| 3000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.4 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.76 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5100mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.88 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| -- | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G is way better than the vivo iQOO 12 Pro, getting a 92.3 score against 71.5. Both phones in our current comparison have Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has older 11 version and vivo iQOO 12 Pro has Android 14. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G is an way older device than vivo iQOO 12 Pro, but Samsung managed to build it somewhat thinner and somewhat lighter anyway.
Vivo iQOO 12 Pro features a lot better looking display than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has a little bit larger screen, a better resolution of 1440 x 3200 pixels and a just a little better amount of pixels in each display inch. Vivo iQOO 12 Pro and Galaxy Z Flip 5G count with incredibly similar storage capacity for apps and games, both of them have equal internal storage capacity.
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with a very superior hardware performance than vivo iQOO 12 Pro, although it has lesser RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. Vivo iQOO 12 Pro shoots much better photographs and videos than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has a larger diafragm aperture, a lot larger back-facing camera sensor which offers a way better image and video quality, a lot more mega-pixels back camera and a much better video resolution.
Vivo iQOO 12 Pro features a much better battery performance than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has a 55% larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.