Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 94.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2023-11-14 | 2020-09-18 |
| 6.48 x 2.97 x 0.34 inches | 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 9.95 ounces |
| Black, Red and White | Mystic black and Mystic bronze |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | $ 1930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 516 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| 3000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.76 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5100mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.88 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| -- | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 is way better than vivo iQOO 12 Pro, getting a global score of 94.6 against 71.5. The Galaxy Z Fold 2 is a notably older and much heavier phone than vivo iQOO 12 Pro, but Samsung was able to build it extremely thinner anyway. These phones have Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy Z Fold 2 has an older 11 version and vivo iQOO 12 Pro has Android 14.
The vivo iQOO 12 Pro counts with a much sharper display than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a quite better resolution of 1440 x 3200 and a greater quantity of pixels per inch in the screen. Galaxy Z Fold 2's memory capacity for applications and games is just as good as vivo iQOO 12 Pro's one, both have exactly the same internal memory capacity.
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a much better performing processor than vivo iQOO 12 Pro, although it has less RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. The vivo iQOO 12 Pro captures much clearer photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, because it has a much higher 7680x4320 video resolution, a larger camera aperture for better photos and videos in low light environments, a way more mega pixels back facing camera and a lot larger sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
Vivo iQOO 12 Pro counts with just a little bit longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, because it has a 13% bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.