Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 77.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Sony |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2023-11-14 | 2017-04-05 |
| 6.48 x 2.97 x 0.34 inches | 5.75 x 2.83 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 5.68 ounces |
| Black, Red and White | Black, Blue and Silver |
| -- | Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 700.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 516 pixels per inch | 424 pixels per inch |
| 3000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 8.88 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (960 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.76 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5100mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2900mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.88 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| -- | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Sony Xperia XZs is slightly better than vivo iQOO 12 Pro, with a 77.2 score against 71.5. The Sony Xperia XZs design is incredibly lighter and a bit thinner than vivo iQOO 12 Pro, despite of the fact that it was released 7 years before. The Xperia XZs has a much greater processing power than vivo iQOO 12 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM and a lower number of cores (although faster).
The vivo iQOO 12 Pro counts with a way better display than Xperia XZs, because it has a lot higher 1440 x 3200 resolution, a lot bigger screen and a bit more pixels per inch in the screen. The Xperia XZs shoots just a bit better photographs and videos than vivo iQOO 12 Pro, although it has a back camera with a way worse 19 mega pixels resolution, a lot smaller sensor which gives a lot worse image and video quality, a smaller aperture and a much lower 3840x2160 video resolution.
The vivo iQOO 12 Pro counts with much more memory for games and applications than Xperia XZs, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 224 GB more internal memory capacity. Vivo iQOO 12 Pro features a much better battery duration than Xperia XZs, because it has a 5100mAh battery capacity against 2900mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.