Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 90.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Xiaomi |
| Android 14 | Android 10 |
| 2023-11-14 | 2020-05-08 |
| 6.48 x 2.97 x 0.34 inches | 7.00 x 3.28 x 0.40 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Black, Red and White | Blasting black |
| -- | Aluminum and Aluminum |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 7.1 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 516 pixels per inch | 484 pixels per inch |
| 3000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.4 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.76 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5100mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.88 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| -- | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro has a score of 90.1, which is a lot better than the vivo iQOO 12 Pro's 71.5 score. Both of these devices use Android OS, but Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro has 10 version while vivo iQOO 12 Pro has Android 14. Despite being the best phone we are comparing, the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro construction is incredibly older, thicker and a little bit heavier than the vivo iQOO 12 Pro.
The vivo iQOO 12 Pro counts with a lot better looking display than Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a bit higher 1440 x 3200 resolution and a little bit higher pixels quantity in each inch of screen. The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro's memory capacity for apps and games is just as good as vivo iQOO 12 Pro's one, they have the same 256 GB internal storage capacity.
The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro counts with a much greater hardware performance than vivo iQOO 12 Pro, although it has lesser RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. The vivo iQOO 12 Pro counts with just a bit longer battery performance than Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro, because it has a 5100mAh battery capacity against 5000mAh.
The vivo iQOO 12 Pro takes slightly better photographs and videos than Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro, because although it has a camera in the back with way less megapixels resolution, it also counts with a much higher 7680x4320 video quality, a bigger camera aperture to capture better low light captures and a way larger back camera sensor which gives a way higher image and video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.