Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Xiaomi |
| Android 14 | Android 11 |
| 2023-11-14 | 2021-03-29 |
| 6.48 x 2.97 x 0.34 inches | 6.47 x 2.94 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 8.25 ounces |
| Black, Red and White | Ceramic Black and Ceramic White |
| -- | Ceramic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 516 pixels per inch | 516 pixels per inch |
| 3000 cd/m2 brightness | 1700 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.4 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (1920 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.76 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | 5G, 5G, HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 8.2 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5100mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.88 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| -- | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra is much better than vivo iQOO 12 Pro, with a 90.7 score against 71.5. The Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra body is just a little thinner than the vivo iQOO 12 Pro, although it's somewhat heavier and was released many years before. These phones come with Android OS, but the Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra has the older 11 version and vivo iQOO 12 Pro has Android 14.
The vivo iQOO 12 Pro has a bit more vivid screen than Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra, and although they both have the same number of pixels per inch of screen, a display with the same size and the same 1440 x 3200 pixels resolution, the vivo iQOO 12 Pro also has much more brightness. The Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra features as much storage capacity to store more apps and games as the vivo iQOO 12 Pro, they have equal internal storage.
The Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra counts with a much better performing processor than vivo iQOO 12 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. The vivo iQOO 12 Pro has a bit better camera than Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra, and although they both have the same video quality and a 50 megapixels resolution back-facing camera, the vivo iQOO 12 Pro also has a bigger aperture, better 30 fps video frame rate and a much bigger sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
The vivo iQOO 12 Pro has a bit superior battery life than Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra, because it has a 2 percent greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.