Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 87.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Xiaomi |
| Android 14 | Android 10 |
| 2023-11-14 | 2020-05-12 |
| 6.48 x 2.97 x 0.34 inches | 6.43 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Black, Red and White | Cyber grey, Electric purple, Neon blue and Phantom white |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 516 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 3000 cd/m2 brightness | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.4 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.76 | 12.98 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5100mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4700mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.88 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| -- | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has a general score of 87.9, which is much better than vivo iQOO 12 Pro's global score of 71.5. The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro is better than vivo iQOO 12 Pro, we must highlight that it's also an extremely older, just a little heavier and a little bit thicker phone. Both devices we are comparing use Android OS, but Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has 10 version and vivo iQOO 12 Pro has Android 14 version.
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro counts with a much better processing power than vivo iQOO 12 Pro, although it has lesser RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. The vivo iQOO 12 Pro has a more vivid display than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, because it has a quite larger display, a better pixels number per inch of screen, a better 1440 x 3200 pixels resolution and much more brightness.
The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro takes clearer photos and videos than vivo iQOO 12 Pro, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not recommended for low light images and a way tinier back camera sensor providing a much lower image quality, and they both have the same video quality and the same video frame rates, the Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro also counts with a way more mega pixels camera in the back.
The vivo iQOO 12 Pro counts with a superior memory for applications and games than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, because it has more internal storage capacity. The vivo iQOO 12 Pro has a bit better battery performance than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, because it has 5100mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.