Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 76 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | ZTE |
| Android 14 | Android 10 |
| 2023-11-14 | 2020-03-30 |
| 6.48 x 2.97 x 0.34 inches | 6.27 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Black, Red and White | Black |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 516 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| 3000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G chipset |
| processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 17.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.76 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5100mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.88 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| -- | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
ZTE Axon 11 is a little bit better than the vivo iQOO 12 Pro, having a global score of 76 against 71.5. The ZTE Axon 11 is an notably older phone than the vivo iQOO 12 Pro, but ZTE could make it just a little bit thinner and somewhat lighter anyway. Both devices in this comparison have Android OS (Operating System), but the ZTE Axon 11 has the previous 10 version while vivo iQOO 12 Pro has Android 14.
ZTE Axon 11 has a much better performance than vivo iQOO 12 Pro, although it has lesser RAM, they both have the same number of cores. The vivo iQOO 12 Pro has a much better display than ZTE Axon 11, because it has a higher amount of pixels per display inch, a higher 1440 x 3200 resolution and a quite larger display.
Vivo iQOO 12 Pro shoots much clearer photographs and videos than ZTE Axon 11, because although it has a back camera with a much lower resolution, it also counts with a lot better video quality and a larger aperture to capture better low-light photography. ZTE Axon 11 counts with a very superior storage capacity to install applications and games than vivo iQOO 12 Pro, because although it has only 128 GB internal storage, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that allows up to 2 TB.
The vivo iQOO 12 Pro counts with greater battery performance than ZTE Axon 11, because it has a 28 percent more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.