Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 78.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | ZTE |
| Android 14 | Android 11 |
| 2023-11-14 | 2021-06-04 |
| 6.48 x 2.97 x 0.34 inches | 6.36 x 2.87 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Black, Red and White | Black, Gold, Green and White |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 516 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 3000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 35.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.76 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 10.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5100mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4600mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.88 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| -- | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The ZTE Axon 30 Ultra is just a bit better than vivo iQOO 12 Pro, getting a 78.1 score against 71.5. These devices come with Android operating system, but the ZTE Axon 30 Ultra has the older 11 version and vivo iQOO 12 Pro has Android 14. Despite of the fact that the ZTE Axon 30 Ultra is noticeably older than vivo iQOO 12 Pro, it's design is a little lighter and a little bit thinner.
Vivo iQOO 12 Pro features a much better display than ZTE Axon 30 Ultra, because it has a higher 1440 x 3200 pixels resolution, a higher display pixel density and a quite bigger display. Vivo iQOO 12 Pro has a way bigger memory for games and applications than ZTE Axon 30 Ultra, because it has 256 GB internal storage capacity.
ZTE Axon 30 Ultra features a much greater hardware performance than vivo iQOO 12 Pro, although it has 8 GB less RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. Vivo iQOO 12 Pro features just a bit better battery life than ZTE Axon 30 Ultra, because it has a 5100mAh battery capacity. The vivo iQOO 12 Pro shoots slightly better videos and photos than ZTE Axon 30 Ultra, although it has a lower 7680x4320 video quality, a way lower 50 megapixels resolution back camera and a smaller camera aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.