Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 92.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Apple |
| Android 9.0 Pie | iOS 15.x, 14.x |
| 2019-09-16 | 2020-10-23 |
| 6.59 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 5.78 x 2.82 x 0.29 inches |
| 7.71 ounces | 6.66 ounces |
| Glowing night | Gold, Graphite, Pacific blue and Silver |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2256 x 1080 pixels | 2532 x 1170 pixels |
| P-OLED | OLED |
| 362 pixels per inch | 457 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Apple A14 Bionic (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | 64-bit 64-bit (Hexa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.72 | 10.62 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 2815mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone 12 Pro has a general score of 92.8, which is much better than vivo NEX 3's 73.9 global score. The iPhone 12 Pro is a newer phone, and it's also notably thinner and lighter than vivo NEX 3. The iPhone 12 Pro has iOS 15.x operating system, while vivo NEX 3 works with Android 9.0 Pie operating system.
The iPhone 12 Pro features a little better processing power than vivo NEX 3, because although it has lesser processing cores (although they are faster) and less RAM, it also counts with a 64 bits processor. IPhone 12 Pro counts with a sharper screen than vivo NEX 3, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a greater count of pixels per inch in the display and a little higher resolution of 1170 x 2532px.
Vivo NEX 3 captures much clearer videos and photos than iPhone 12 Pro, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not so good for low light photography and video and worse video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the vivo NEX 3 also counts with a lot more megapixels back camera.
The vivo NEX 3 features much more storage capacity to install applications and games than Apple iPhone 12 Pro, because it has 256 GB internal memory. Vivo NEX 3 features a superior battery duration than iPhone 12 Pro, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.