Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 93.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Apple |
| Android 9.0 Pie | iOS 15.x, 14.x |
| 2019-09-16 | 2020-11-13 |
| 6.59 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.33 x 3.07 x 0.29 inches |
| 7.71 ounces | 8.03 ounces |
| Glowing night | Gold, Graphite, Pacific blue and Silver |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1100.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2256 x 1080 pixels | 2778 x 1284 pixels |
| P-OLED | OLED |
| 362 pixels per inch | 457 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Apple A14 Bionic (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | 64-bit 64-bit (Hexa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.72 | 10.62 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3687mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone 12 Pro Max has a score of 93.2, which is a lot better than the vivo NEX 3's global score of 73.9. Although the iPhone 12 Pro Max is a bit heavier than vivo NEX 3, it's extremely thinner and newer. IPhone 12 Pro Max has iOS 15.x operating system, while vivo NEX 3 comes with Android 9.0 Pie operating system.
IPhone 12 Pro Max has a little better performance than vivo NEX 3, because although it has lesser RAM and lesser processing cores , it also counts with a 64 bits CPU. IPhone 12 Pro Max counts with a better looking screen than vivo NEX 3, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better pixel quantity in each inch of display and a higher resolution of 1284 x 2778.
Vivo NEX 3 features a much bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than iPhone 12 Pro Max, because it has 256 GB internal storage capacity. Vivo NEX 3 counts with improved battery performance than iPhone 12 Pro Max, because it has a 22% more battery size. Vivo NEX 3 has a lot better camera than Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max, because although it has a smaller camera aperture and slower 30 fps video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the vivo NEX 3 also counts with a way more mega pixels back camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.