Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 93.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Apple |
| Android 9.0 Pie | iOS 15.x |
| 2019-09-16 | 2021-09-24 |
| 6.59 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 5.78 x 2.81 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.71 ounces | 7.20 ounces |
| Glowing night | Gold, Graphite, Sierra Blue and Silver |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 999.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2256 x 1080 pixels | 2532 x 1170 pixels |
| P-OLED | OLED |
| 362 pixels per inch | 457 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | 64-bit Hexa-Core 3240 MHz processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.72 | 10.71 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3095mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.04 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone 13 Pro is way better than the vivo NEX 3, getting a 93.3 score against 73.9. The iPhone 13 Pro has iOS 15.x OS, while vivo NEX 3 has Android 9.0 Pie OS. The iPhone 13 Pro is a extremely newer phone, and it's also a bit lighter and thinner than the vivo NEX 3. The iPhone 13 Pro has a quite better hardware performance than vivo NEX 3, because although it has 2 GB less RAM memory and 2 less cpu cores , it also counts with a 64-bit processor.
IPhone 13 Pro has a sharper screen than vivo NEX 3, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a slightly higher resolution of 1170 x 2532 pixels and more pixels per inch in the display. The vivo NEX 3 counts with a very superior storage for applications and games than iPhone 13 Pro, because it has 128 GB more internal storage capacity.
The vivo NEX 3 features a much longer battery performance than iPhone 13 Pro, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity instead of 3095mAh. The vivo NEX 3 counts with a greater camera than Apple iPhone 13 Pro, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not nice for taking photos or video in low light environments and worse video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the vivo NEX 3 also counts with a much higher 64 megapixels resolution back-facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.