Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 93.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Apple |
| Android 9.0 Pie | iOS 15.x |
| 2019-09-16 | 2021-09-24 |
| 6.59 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.33 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.71 ounces | 8.47 ounces |
| Glowing night | Gold, Graphite, Sierra Blue and Silver |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1099.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2256 x 1080 pixels | 2778 x 1284 pixels |
| P-OLED | OLED |
| 362 pixels per inch | 457 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | 64-bit Hexa-Core 3240 MHz processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.72 | 10.71 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4352mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone 13 Pro Max is way better than vivo NEX 3, getting a 93.2 score against 73.9. IPhone 13 Pro Max is a much newer and thinner phone than the vivo NEX 3, but it's also a bit heavier. IPhone 13 Pro Max has iOS 15.x OS, and vivo NEX 3 counts with Android 9.0 Pie OS. The iPhone 13 Pro Max counts with a faster CPU than vivo NEX 3, because although it has less processing cores and a smaller amount of RAM memory, it also counts with a 64 bits processing unit.
The iPhone 13 Pro Max features a slightly better screen than vivo NEX 3, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a greater pixels quantity per inch of display and a better 1284 x 2778 resolution. The vivo NEX 3 has a lot bigger memory for games and applications than iPhone 13 Pro Max, because it has 256 GB internal memory capacity.
Vivo NEX 3 features a bit superior battery lifetime than Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max, because it has a 4500mAh battery size. Vivo NEX 3 has a lot better camera than iPhone 13 Pro Max, because although it has worse 30 fps video frame rate and a tinier aperture which is not favorable for low-light photos and videos, and they both have the same video definition, the vivo NEX 3 also counts with a camera with a lot better 64 mega pixels resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.