Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Apple |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-09-16 | 2017-11-03 |
| 6.59 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.71 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Glowing night | Silver and Space gray |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2256 x 1080 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| P-OLED | OLED |
| 362 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 9.72 | 10.17 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone X has a general score of 88.1, which is better than vivo NEX 3's general score of 73.9. Although iPhone X is older than the vivo NEX 3, it's construction is somewhat thinner and incredibly lighter. The iPhone X features a sharper screen than vivo NEX 3, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a quite better 1125 x 2436 resolution and a better pixels density.
The iPhone X has a bit more powerful processing unit than vivo NEX 3, because although it has 5 GB lesser RAM memory and an inferior number of cores and slower, it also counts with a 64 bits processing unit. The iPhone X's storage for apps and games is just as good as the vivo NEX 3 one, they have the same internal storage capacity.
Vivo NEX 3 counts with a much longer battery lifetime than Apple iPhone X, because it has a 66 percent greater battery capacity. The vivo NEX 3 captures much clearer videos and photos than Apple iPhone X, because although it has lower 30 fps video frame rates, and they both have a same size aperture and the same video quality, the vivo NEX 3 also counts with a lot larger sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a much better resolution back-facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.