Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 82 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Apple |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-09-16 | 2018-10-26 |
| 6.59 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 5.94 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.71 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Glowing night | Black, Blue, Red, Rose gold, White and Yellow |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2256 x 1080 pixels | 1792 x 828 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 362 pixels per inch | 324 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 9.72 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 2942mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone XR is better than the vivo NEX 3, having an 82 score against 73.9. IPhone XR is an older cellphone than the vivo NEX 3, but Apple managed to make it somewhat thinner and lighter anyway. IPhone XR counts with a bit better screen than vivo NEX 3, although it has a quite lower pixel density, a much lower resolution of 828 x 1792 and a bit smaller display.
Apple iPhone XR has a bit superior processing unit than vivo NEX 3, because although it has a lower number of cores and slower and less RAM memory, it also counts with a 64-bit processor. The vivo NEX 3 counts with a much better camera than iPhone XR, because although it has worse 30 fps video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition and the same diafragm aperture, the vivo NEX 3 also counts with a lot larger sensor providing a much better image quality and a back camera with a lot higher resolution.
Vivo NEX 3 features a way bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than iPhone XR, because it has more internal storage. The vivo NEX 3 has a really longer battery life than iPhone XR, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.