Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 84.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Apple |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-09-16 | 2018-09-21 |
| 6.59 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.71 ounces | 6.24 ounces |
| Glowing night | Gold, Silver and Space gray |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 999.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2256 x 1080 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| P-OLED | OLED |
| 362 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 9.72 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 2659mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone XS has an overall score of 84.2, which is much better than vivo NEX 3's 73.9 overall score. The iPhone XS is an older phone than vivo NEX 3, but Apple was able to make it somewhat thinner and somewhat lighter. IPhone XS features just a little better hardware performance than vivo NEX 3, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM and less and slower cores, it also counts with a 64-bit processor.
IPhone XS features a more vivid display than vivo NEX 3, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with more pixels per inch in the display and a little higher 1125 x 2436 resolution. Vivo NEX 3 features a much better camera than iPhone XS, because although it has lower 30 frames per second video frame rates, and they both have a F1.8 diafragm aperture and the same (4K) video resolution, the vivo NEX 3 also counts with a lot larger sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a camera with lot more mega pixels.
Vivo NEX 3 features a very superior storage for games and applications than iPhone XS, because it has 256 GB internal storage. The vivo NEX 3 features a really longer battery duration than iPhone XS, because it has a 69 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.