Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 80.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-09-16 | 2016-10-20 |
| 6.59 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 5.66 x 2.74 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.71 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Glowing night | Black, Gray and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 5 inches |
| 2256 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| P-OLED | AMOLED |
| 362 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.72 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 2770mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel has a score of 80.2, which is slightly better than vivo NEX 3's general score of 73.9. Although the Google Pixel is incredibly older than the vivo NEX 3, it's design is just a little thinner and notably lighter. The vivo NEX 3 features a bit faster processing unit than Google Pixel, because it has a greater number of cores (and they are faster) and a higher amount of RAM.
The Google Pixel features a slightly better display than vivo NEX 3, because although it has a really smaller display and a bit lower 1080 x 1920 pixels resolution, it also counts with a little bit greater amount of pixels in each display inch. The vivo NEX 3 features a very superior storage to install applications and games than Google Pixel, because it has more internal storage.
Vivo NEX 3 features a really longer battery duration than Google Pixel, because it has a 4500mAh battery size against 2770mAh. Vivo NEX 3 shoots much better videos and photos than Google Pixel, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the vivo NEX 3 also has a back camera with way more MP, a bigger aperture and a much bigger back-facing camera sensor providing a way better image quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.