Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-09-16 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.59 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.71 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Glowing night | Black, Pink and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 157.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2256 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | P-OLED |
| 362 pixels per inch | 439 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3 is a bit better than vivo NEX 3, having an 80 score against 73.9. Even though Google Pixel 3 is older than the vivo NEX 3, it's body is lighter and thinner. The Google Pixel 3 counts with a little sharper display than vivo NEX 3, because although it has a really smaller display and a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2160, it also counts with a little bit better screen pixel density.
Vivo NEX 3 features a much bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Google Pixel 3, because it has 192 GB more internal memory capacity. The vivo NEX 3 counts with a little faster CPU than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the vivo NEX 3 also has a larger amount of RAM.
The vivo NEX 3 has a very superior battery duration than Google Pixel 3, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity instead of 2915mAh. Vivo NEX 3 takes way better videos and photos than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the same video frame rates and a F1.8 diafragm aperture, the vivo NEX 3 also has a lot more megapixels back-facing camera and a lot larger camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.