Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-09-16 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.59 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.71 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| Glowing night | Black, Pink and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 194.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2256 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 362 pixels per inch | 522 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3430mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3 XL is a bit better than the vivo NEX 3, with a global score of 80.7 against 73.9. The Google Pixel 3 XL is an older cellphone than the vivo NEX 3, but it is thinner and somewhat lighter anyway. Vivo NEX 3 features a bit better performance than Google Pixel 3 XL, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the vivo NEX 3 also has more RAM.
The Google Pixel 3 XL features a little more vivid screen than vivo NEX 3, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2960 and a greater amount of pixels per inch of screen. The vivo NEX 3 features much more memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Google Pixel 3 XL, because it has 256 GB internal storage capacity.
Vivo NEX 3 has better battery duration than Google Pixel 3 XL, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity. The vivo NEX 3 shoots a lot better videos and photos than Google Pixel 3 XL, and although they both have the same video frame rate, the same 3840x2160 video definition and the same camera aperture, the vivo NEX 3 also has a way more mega pixels camera in the back and a much larger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.