Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-09-16 | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.59 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.71 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Glowing night | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2256 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | OLED |
| 362 pixels per inch | 443 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4 has a score of 81.9, which is much better than the vivo NEX 3's 73.9 general score. Google Pixel 4's body is noticeably lighter and thinner than the vivo NEX 3, although both were only released 1 months apart. Google Pixel 4 has a little sharper display than vivo NEX 3, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2280 pixels and a little bit more pixels per inch in the display.
Vivo NEX 3 features a bit more powerful processor than Google Pixel 4, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the vivo NEX 3 also has 2 GB more RAM. The vivo NEX 3 shoots much better pictures and videos than Google Pixel 4, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is worse for low light images, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the vivo NEX 3 also counts with a back-facing camera with way more MP and a lot bigger sensor which gives a much better image and video quality.
The vivo NEX 3 has a much bigger storage for apps and games than Google Pixel 4, because it has more internal memory capacity. Vivo NEX 3 has a superior battery lifetime than Google Pixel 4, because it has a 61 percent more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.