Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-09-16 | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.59 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.31 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.71 ounces | 6.81 ounces |
| Glowing night | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 487.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2256 x 1080 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | OLED |
| 362 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4 XL is better than vivo NEX 3, having a general score of 82.9 against 73.9. The Google Pixel 4 XL is a lighter and thinner device than vivo NEX 3, even though both were only released with a couple of months difference. Google Pixel 4 XL counts with a slightly better looking display than vivo NEX 3, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a greater amount of pixels per screen inch and a higher resolution of 1440 x 3040px.
The vivo NEX 3 features much more storage for games and applications than Google Pixel 4 XL, because it has 256 GB internal memory. The vivo NEX 3 counts with a little better performance than Google Pixel 4 XL, and although they both have the same number of cores, the vivo NEX 3 also has a higher amount of RAM.
Vivo NEX 3 has a lot better camera than Google Pixel 4 XL, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same video definition, the vivo NEX 3 also counts with a lot better 64 megapixels resolution camera in the back and a way larger back-facing camera sensor taking much higher quality photos.
Vivo NEX 3 counts with greater battery lifetime than Google Pixel 4 XL, because it has a 22% larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.