Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-09-16 | 2020-08-20 |
| 6.59 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 5.67 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.71 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Glowing night | Just black |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 349.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2256 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | OLED |
| 362 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AA chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3140mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4a has a score of 82.9, which is much better than the vivo NEX 3's 73.9 general score. These devices work with Android OS (Operating System), but Google Pixel 4a has the older 11 version and vivo NEX 3 has Android 9.0 Pie version. Google Pixel 4a's construction is newer, lighter and thinner than the vivo NEX 3.
The vivo NEX 3 counts with a bit superior processor than Google Pixel 4a, and although they both have the same number of cores, the vivo NEX 3 also has a larger amount of RAM. Google Pixel 4a features a slightly better looking screen than vivo NEX 3, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a little bit greater quantity of pixels per inch in the screen and a bit higher 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution.
Vivo NEX 3 has a superior storage for applications and games than Google Pixel 4a, because it has more internal memory capacity. Vivo NEX 3 features a superior battery lifetime than Google Pixel 4a, because it has a 43 percent greater battery size. The vivo NEX 3 shoots a lot better videos and photos than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same (4K) video resolution, the vivo NEX 3 also counts with a camera in the back with a much higher resolution and a way larger back camera sensor which offers a lot higher image and video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.