Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 87.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11 |
| 2019-09-16 | 2020-11-19 |
| 6.59 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.06 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.71 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Glowing night | Clearly white and Just black |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2256 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | OLED |
| 362 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3885mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4a 5G is better than vivo NEX 3, having an 87.5 score against 73.9. These phones include Android operating system, but Google Pixel 4a 5G has 11 version while vivo NEX 3 has Android 9.0 Pie. The Google Pixel 4a 5G design is newer, somewhat thinner and incredibly lighter than the vivo NEX 3.
The Google Pixel 4a 5G counts with a little more vivid display than vivo NEX 3, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a little bit more pixels per display inch and a quite better 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution. The vivo NEX 3 counts with just a little better performance than Google Pixel 4a 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the vivo NEX 3 also has 2 GB more RAM memory.
The vivo NEX 3 shoots better photos and videos than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has slower video frame rates and a smaller aperture which is not good for low-light images, and they both have the same video quality, the vivo NEX 3 also counts with a way larger sensor providing a much higher image quality and a lot higher resolution back facing camera.
Vivo NEX 3 has a superior memory capacity for apps and games than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because it has 128 GB more internal storage. Vivo NEX 3 has just a bit longer battery lifetime than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because it has a 16 percent larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.