Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-09-16 | 2020-10-15 |
| 6.59 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 5.70 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.71 ounces | 5.33 ounces |
| Glowing night | Just black and Sorta sage |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 548.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6 inches |
| 2256 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | OLED |
| 362 pixels per inch | 430 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4080mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 5 is much better than the vivo NEX 3, getting a global score of 89 against 73.9. The Google Pixel 5 is a newer device, and it's also much lighter and thinner than vivo NEX 3. The vivo NEX 3 counts with a little better performance than Google Pixel 5. Both have a Octa-Core processing unit and 8 GB of RAM memory.
Google Pixel 5 features a slightly better looking screen than vivo NEX 3, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a quite better 1080 x 2340 resolution and a quite higher screen pixel density. Vivo NEX 3 features a much bigger storage for games and applications than Google Pixel 5, because it has 256 GB internal memory.
Vivo NEX 3 has a superior camera than Google Pixel 5, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture and worse 30 frames per second video frame rates, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the vivo NEX 3 also counts with a lot larger sensor which provides a way better photo and video quality and a back-facing camera with a much better 64 megapixels resolution.
The vivo NEX 3 counts with just a little bit longer battery duration than Google Pixel 5, because it has a 4500mAh battery size against 4080mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.