Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 92.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 14 |
| 2019-09-16 | 2024-03-22 |
| 6.59 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.71 ounces | 8.36 ounces |
| Glowing night | Agate Grey and Frozen Berry |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass and Titanium |
| -- | $ 1389.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2256 x 1080 pixels | 2800 x 1280 pixels |
| P-OLED | LTPO |
| 362 pixels per inch | 453 pixels per inch |
| -- | 5000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 10.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | 1x Cortex-X4 3.3GHz, 3x Cortex-A720 3.2GHz, 2x Cortex- A720 3.0GHz, 2x Cortex-A520 2.3GHz, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 24 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.72 | 10.08 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 1 TB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 23.2 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.40 aperture |
| -- | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.49") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 5600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 7.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass and Gyroscope |
Comparison review
Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design is way better than vivo NEX 3, getting a general score of 92.1 against 73.9. Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design's body is newer and just a bit thinner than vivo NEX 3's, but it's also a little bit heavier. Both phones in this comparison review work with Android OS (operating system), but the Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design has the previous 14 version and vivo NEX 3 has Android 9.0 Pie version.
The Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design counts with a little better performance than vivo NEX 3, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design also has a higher amount of RAM. Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design counts with a way better looking display than vivo NEX 3, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a better display density and a higher resolution of 1280 x 2800.
The Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design features a slightly better camera than vivo NEX 3, because although it has a camera in the back with lot less megapixels resolution and a lower 3840x2160 video quality, it also counts with a bigger back camera sensor which provides a higher photo and video quality and a lot larger camera aperture to take better photography and videos in low light environments.
The Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design has a superior memory capacity to install games and applications than vivo NEX 3, because it has 1 TB internal storage capacity. The Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design has greater battery duration than vivo NEX 3, because it has 5600mAh of battery capacity against 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.