Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 92.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 14 |
| 2019-09-16 | 2024-03-22 |
| 6.59 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.71 ounces | 8.36 ounces |
| Glowing night | Agate Grey and Frozen Berry |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass and Titanium |
| -- | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2256 x 1080 pixels | 2800 x 1280 pixels |
| P-OLED | LTPO |
| 362 pixels per inch | 453 pixels per inch |
| -- | 5000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 10.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | 1x Cortex-X4 3.3GHz, 3x Cortex-A720 3.2GHz, 2x Cortex- A720 3.0GHz, 2x Cortex-A520 2.3GHz, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 24 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.72 | 10.08 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 1 TB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 23.2 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.40 aperture |
| -- | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.49") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 5600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 7.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass and Gyroscope |
Comparison review
The Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Edition is way better than the vivo NEX 3, having a global score of 92.1 against 73.9. Both of these phones work with Android operating system, but the Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Edition has older 14 version while vivo NEX 3 has Android 9.0 Pie version. Even though Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Edition is just a little bit heavier than the vivo NEX 3, it's just a little thinner and a lot newer.
Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Edition features a bit better hardware performance than vivo NEX 3, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Edition also has a higher amount of RAM memory. Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Edition counts with a way better looking display than vivo NEX 3, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a better pixels amount in each inch in the display and a higher 1280 x 2800 resolution.
Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Edition features just a bit better camera than vivo NEX 3, because although it has a way lower 50 megapixels resolution back-facing camera and a worse video resolution, it also counts with a larger camera sensor providing a better image quality and a lot larger aperture for better images and video in poorly lited situations.
Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Edition counts with a much bigger memory for applications and games than vivo NEX 3, because it has more internal memory. Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Edition features superior battery performance than vivo NEX 3, because it has 5600mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.