Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | HTC |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-09-16 | 2017-02-21 |
| 6.59 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.39 x 3.14 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.71 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Glowing night | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2256 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| P-OLED | S-LCD 5 |
| 362 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.72 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The HTC U Ultra has a general score of 77, which is a bit better than the vivo NEX 3's 73.9 overall score. Even though the HTC U Ultra is noticeably older than the vivo NEX 3, it's construction is lighter and thinner. HTC U Ultra counts with a little bit better screen than vivo NEX 3, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a better display pixels density and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560px.
HTC U Ultra has a better storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than vivo NEX 3, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. The vivo NEX 3 counts with a little better performance than HTC U Ultra, because it has 4 more processing cores and a larger amount of RAM.
The vivo NEX 3 features a much better battery duration than HTC U Ultra, because it has a 50 percent more battery size. The vivo NEX 3 shoots a lot better photographs and videos than HTC U Ultra, and although they both have a same size aperture, the same (4K) video quality and the same video frame rates, the vivo NEX 3 also has a much higher resolution back camera and a much larger back camera sensor which provides a way higher photo and video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.