Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | HTC |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-09-16 | 2017-05-18 |
| 6.59 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.06 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.71 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Glowing night | Black, Blue, Silver and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass and Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 275.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2256 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| P-OLED | S-LCD 5 |
| 362 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 10.02 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
HTC U11 has a score of 77.6, which is a little bit better than the vivo NEX 3's score of 73.9. HTC U11's design is much lighter and thinner than vivo NEX 3, despite of the fact that it was released many years before. The vivo NEX 3 counts with just a bit better hardware performance than HTC U11, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the vivo NEX 3 also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
HTC U11 counts with a bit more vivid display than vivo NEX 3, because although it has a lot smaller screen, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2560 resolution and more pixels per inch in the display. The vivo NEX 3 counts with a lot bigger storage capacity for apps and games than HTC U11, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity.
Vivo NEX 3 features a way better camera than HTC U11, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture, and they both have the same video resolution and the same video frame rates, the vivo NEX 3 also counts with a way higher resolution camera and a much larger back camera sensor. The vivo NEX 3 counts with a much better battery lifetime than HTC U11, because it has a 50% bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.