Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | LG |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 8.1 Oreo |
| 2019-09-16 | 2018-11-09 |
| 6.59 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.71 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Glowing night | Black and Gray |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2256 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 362 pixels per inch | 563 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.72 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 12.76 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG G7 Fit has a general score of 77, which is a bit better than the vivo NEX 3's 73.9 global score. The LG G7 Fit design is thinner and noticeably lighter than vivo NEX 3, although it was released just 10 months before. These phones work with Android operating system, but LG G7 Fit has older 8.1 Oreo version and vivo NEX 3 has Android 9.0 Pie.
LG G7 Fit has a much sharper display than vivo NEX 3, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a way better display pixels density and a better 1440 x 3120 pixels resolution. The vivo NEX 3 has a bit more powerful processor than LG G7 Fit, because it has 4 GB more RAM memory and more cores.
The vivo NEX 3 takes a lot better photos and videos than LG G7 Fit, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same video definition, the vivo NEX 3 also has a way bigger sensor which offers a way better image and video quality, a larger aperture and a lot more mega-pixels back-facing camera.
The vivo NEX 3 features just a bit more storage capacity for games and applications than LG G7 Fit, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 224 GB more internal memory. Vivo NEX 3 features a way better battery lifetime than LG G7 Fit, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.