Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 84.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | LG |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-09-16 | 2019-04-11 |
| 6.59 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 5.98 x 2.83 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.71 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Glowing night | Aurora black, Carmine red and Platinum gray |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 215.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2256 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | OLED |
| 362 pixels per inch | 563 pixels per inch |
| -- | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG G8 ThinQ is better than the vivo NEX 3, getting a score of 84.3 against 73.9. The LG G8 ThinQ construction is somewhat thinner and way lighter than vivo NEX 3, even though both were released with only 5 months difference. Both of these phones have the same Android 9.0 Pie OS, so you shouldn't notice any differences regarding operating system features.
The LG G8 ThinQ features a sharper screen than vivo NEX 3, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 3120 pixels resolution and a lot more pixels per inch of display. LG G8 ThinQ features a very superior memory for applications and games than vivo NEX 3, because although it has just 128 GB internal storage, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that admits up to 1,95 TB.
The vivo NEX 3 counts with a little bit better hardware performance than LG G8 ThinQ, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the vivo NEX 3 also has 2 GB more RAM memory. Vivo NEX 3 features a superior camera than LG G8 ThinQ, because although it has worse video frame rate and a tinier diafragm aperture which is worse for low-light images and videos, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the vivo NEX 3 also counts with a much larger sensor shooting lot higher quality videos and photographs and a back facing camera with a lot higher 64 mega pixels resolution.
Vivo NEX 3 features improved battery life than LG G8 ThinQ, because it has a 29 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.