Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 82.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | LG |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-09-16 | 2019-11-01 |
| 6.59 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.27 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.71 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Glowing night | Aurora black |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 222.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2256 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | OLED |
| 362 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG G8X ThinQ is better than vivo NEX 3, with an 82.7 score against 73.9. Both phones we are comparing use Android OS (Operating System), but the LG G8X ThinQ has 10 version and vivo NEX 3 has Android 9.0 Pie version. The LG G8X ThinQ is a thinner and somewhat lighter phone than the vivo NEX 3, although both were released with only a few months difference.
LG G8X ThinQ counts with a bit sharper display than vivo NEX 3, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a bit higher 1080 x 2340px resolution and a just a little higher number of pixels per display inch. The vivo NEX 3 has a bit better hardware performance than LG G8X ThinQ, and although they both have the same number of cores, the vivo NEX 3 also has more RAM memory.
The vivo NEX 3 has a much better camera than LG G8X ThinQ, because although it has lower 30 fps video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality and the same diafragm aperture, the vivo NEX 3 also counts with a much more mega pixels camera and a way bigger sensor capturing lot better quality videos and photographs.
LG G8X ThinQ has a superior memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than vivo NEX 3, because although it has only 128 GB internal memory, it also counts with an external SD slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. Vivo NEX 3 features just a bit longer battery performance than LG G8X ThinQ, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.