Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 78.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | LG |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 5.1 |
| 2019-09-16 | 2015-10-01 |
| 6.59 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.28 x 3.12 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.71 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Glowing night | Black, Blue, Brown and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 285.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2256 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 362 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB (933 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 418 GPU |
| 9.72 | 8.28 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | SIM |
| 6.7 | 7.2 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | 120 hours standby time 10 hours talk time |
| 6.32 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V10 is just a bit better than vivo NEX 3, getting a 78.6 score against 73.9. Both of these phones work with Android OS (Operating System), but the LG V10 has older 5.1 version and vivo NEX 3 has Android 9.0 Pie version. Even though the LG V10 is incredibly older than the vivo NEX 3, it's body is lighter and just a little thinner.
The LG V10 counts with a much better screen than vivo NEX 3, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher 2560 x 1440px resolution and a higher screen density. Vivo NEX 3 counts with a quite superior hardware performance than LG V10, because it has a higher number of cores and 4 GB more RAM.
LG V10 counts with a bigger storage to install games and applications than vivo NEX 3, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with an external memory slot that admits up to 1,95 TB. Vivo NEX 3 features a superior camera than LG V10, because although it has lower video frame rates, and they both have a F1.8 aperture and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the vivo NEX 3 also counts with a much larger back camera sensor providing a way higher image quality and a back facing camera with a lot better 64 MP resolution.
Vivo NEX 3 has a very superior battery life than LG V10, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.