Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | LG |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2019-09-16 | 2018-03-09 |
| 6.59 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 7.71 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Glowing night | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6 inches |
| 2256 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | P-OLED |
| 362 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The LG V30S ThinQ is better than vivo NEX 3, getting a overall score of 82.5 against 73.9. LG V30S ThinQ is an older cellphone than the vivo NEX 3, but LG could make it notably thinner and way lighter. These devices use Android OS (Operating System), but the LG V30S ThinQ has the older 8.0 Oreo version and vivo NEX 3 has Android 9.0 Pie.
Vivo NEX 3 has a little bit better performance than LG V30S ThinQ, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the vivo NEX 3 also has more RAM. LG V30S ThinQ has a slightly better screen than vivo NEX 3, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a higher display density and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2880px.
LG V30S ThinQ features much more storage for applications, games, photos and videos than vivo NEX 3, because although it has only 128 GB internal memory, it also counts with an external SD slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. The vivo NEX 3 counts with a very superior camera than LG V30S ThinQ, because although it has a tinier aperture, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the vivo NEX 3 also counts with a camera with a way better resolution and a lot bigger sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
The vivo NEX 3 counts with longer battery performance than LG V30S ThinQ, because it has a 4500mAh battery size against 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.