Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | LG |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-09-16 | 2018-06-08 |
| 6.59 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 7.71 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Glowing night | Black and Gray |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6 inches |
| 2256 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | P-OLED |
| 362 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V35 ThinQ has a general score of 81.3, which is a little bit better than the vivo NEX 3's 73.9 score. The LG V35 ThinQ design is lighter and much thinner than the vivo NEX 3, even though it was released only 16 months before. The vivo NEX 3 counts with a little better processing power than LG V35 ThinQ, and although they both have the same number of cores, the vivo NEX 3 also has 2 GB more RAM memory.
LG V35 ThinQ features just a bit better display than vivo NEX 3, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2880 pixels resolution and a greater pixels density. LG V35 ThinQ features a bigger storage for games and applications than vivo NEX 3, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The vivo NEX 3 counts with greater battery duration than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity. Vivo NEX 3 captures much better pictures and videos than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not favorable for shooting photographs and/or video in low-light situations, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same (4K) video quality, the vivo NEX 3 also counts with a back-facing camera with much more mega pixels and a much larger sensor providing a way higher image quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.