Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | LG |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 10 |
| 2019-09-16 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.59 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.71 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Glowing night | Aurora black and Moroccan blue |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 204.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2256 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | P-OLED |
| 362 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The LG V40 ThinQ has a score of 81.2, which is a little bit better than vivo NEX 3's 73.9 global score. Despite of the fact that the LG V40 ThinQ is older than vivo NEX 3, it's design is somewhat thinner and a lot lighter. Both of these devices have Android OS, but LG V40 ThinQ has 10 version and vivo NEX 3 has Android 9.0 Pie.
LG V40 ThinQ has just a bit better display than vivo NEX 3, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with more pixels per display inch and a better 1440 x 3120px resolution. LG V40 ThinQ features a quite bigger memory for applications and games than vivo NEX 3, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with an external memory card slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Vivo NEX 3 counts with a bit better processor than LG V40 ThinQ, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the vivo NEX 3 also has a higher amount of RAM memory. Vivo NEX 3 counts with superior battery performance than LG V40 ThinQ, because it has a 36 percent bigger battery capacity. Vivo NEX 3 captures better videos and photos than LG V40 ThinQ, because although it has worse 30 fps video frame rate and a tinier camera aperture which is not so good for low-light photography and videos, and they both have the same video definition, the vivo NEX 3 also counts with a back camera with way more mega pixels and a much larger camera sensor shooting much higher quality videos and photographs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.