Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | LG |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-09-16 | 2020-05-15 |
| 6.59 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.71 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Glowing night | Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 264.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2256 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | P-OLED |
| 362 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG Velvet has a global score of 87.1, which is much better than vivo NEX 3's overall score of 73.9. LG Velvet is a somewhat thinner and lighter phone than vivo NEX 3, although both were only released with a couple of months difference. The LG Velvet features a little bit better looking display than vivo NEX 3, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a bit higher 1080 x 2460 resolution and a little bit better pixels density.
LG Velvet counts with a very superior memory for applications and games than vivo NEX 3, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that holds up to 1,95 TB. Vivo NEX 3 features a little faster CPU than LG Velvet, and although they both have the same number of cores, the vivo NEX 3 also has more RAM memory.
Vivo NEX 3 has a bit better battery duration than LG Velvet, because it has a 5 percent greater battery size. Vivo NEX 3 takes a little bit better pictures and videos than LG Velvet, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same camera aperture, the vivo NEX 3 also has a way higher resolution back camera and a bigger sensor which provides a higher image and video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.