Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 91.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | LG |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 10 |
| 2019-09-16 | 2020-10-15 |
| 6.59 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.67 x 2.93 x 0.43 inches |
| 7.71 ounces | 9.17 ounces |
| Glowing night | Aurora gray and Illusion Sky |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2256 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | P-OLED |
| 362 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 20.26 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG Wing is much better than the vivo NEX 3, getting a general score of 91.2 against 73.9. These devices work with Android OS, but LG Wing has older 10 version and vivo NEX 3 has Android 9.0 Pie version. The LG Wing body is newer, but thicker and somewhat heavier than vivo NEX 3. The LG Wing has a little sharper screen than vivo NEX 3, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a little higher pixels density and a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2460 pixels.
Vivo NEX 3 counts with a little bit better processing power than LG Wing. Both of them have 8 GB of RAM memory and 8 cpu cores. LG Wing features a much better storage capacity for applications and games than vivo NEX 3, and although they both have equal 256 GB internal storage, the LG Wing also has a slot for an external memory card that supports up to 1,95 TB.
The vivo NEX 3 features a bit better battery duration than LG Wing, because it has a 13 percent more battery size. LG Wing shoots clearer photos and videos than vivo NEX 3, and although they both have a same size camera sensor, the same resolution camera, a same size aperture and the same (4K) video quality, the LG Wing also has better 60 fps video frame rate.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.