Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 85.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Microsoft |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11 |
| 2019-09-16 | 2021-09-20 |
| 6.59 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 5.72 x 7.26 x 0.22 inches |
| 7.71 ounces | 10.02 ounces |
| Glowing night | Glacier and Obsidian |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 540.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 8.3 inches |
| 2256 x 1080 pixels | 2688 x 1892 pixels |
| P-OLED | AMOLED |
| 362 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4449mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Microsoft Surface Duo 2 has a general score of 85.3, which is much better than vivo NEX 3's overall score of 73.9. Both phones we compare here work with Android operating system, but the Microsoft Surface Duo 2 has an older 11 version while vivo NEX 3 has Android 9.0 Pie. The Microsoft Surface Duo 2 construction is extremely newer and incredibly thinner, but also incredibly heavier than vivo NEX 3.
Vivo NEX 3 has a bit superior processing unit than Microsoft Surface Duo 2. They have 8 cores and a 8 GB RAM. The Microsoft Surface Duo 2 features a little sharper display than vivo NEX 3, because it has a much better 1892 x 2688 pixels resolution, a just a little greater display density and a larger screen.
The vivo NEX 3 counts with a much better camera than Microsoft Surface Duo 2, because although it has worse 30 fps video frame rates and a smaller aperture, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the vivo NEX 3 also counts with a way more mega pixels camera. The vivo NEX 3 features a much better storage capacity for apps and games than Microsoft Surface Duo 2, because it has 256 GB internal memory.
Microsoft Surface Duo 2's battery performance is just as good as the battery lifetime in vivo NEX 3, although the Microsoft Surface Duo 2 has a 1% smaller battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.