Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 89.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Motorola |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 10 |
| 2019-09-16 | 2020-05-14 |
| 6.59 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.36 x 2.80 x 0.37 inches |
| 7.71 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Glowing night | Midnight magenta and Solar black |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 544.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2256 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | OLED |
| 362 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 18.58 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola edge is much better than vivo NEX 3, with a general score of 89.6 against 73.9. Both devices in this comparison work with Android OS, but Motorola edge has an older 10 version while vivo NEX 3 has Android 9.0 Pie. Motorola edge's construction has the same thickness than vivo NEX 3, but it's somewhat lighter.
The vivo NEX 3 has a little faster processor than Motorola edge, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the vivo NEX 3 also has a larger amount of RAM. The Motorola edge and vivo NEX 3 feature extremely similar displays, because although the Motorola edge has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a just a little higher pixel amount per inch of display and a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2340.
Motorola edge features a much bigger memory capacity for apps and games than vivo NEX 3, and although they both have the same internal memory capacity, the Motorola edge also has a slot for external memory cards that supports a maximum of 1000 GB. The Motorola edge's camera is just as good as the camera in vivo NEX 3, both of them have a 0.59 inches back-facing camera sensor, the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the same resolution camera, a F1.8 aperture and the same video frame rates.
The Motorola edge's battery performance is very similar to the battery life in vivo NEX 3.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.