Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 83.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Motorola |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 13 |
| 2019-09-16 | 2023-04-04 |
| 6.59 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.34 x 2.91 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.71 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Glowing night | Interstellar Black |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2256 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | P-OLED |
| 362 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 740 GPU |
| 9.72 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 60.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4600mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 40 Pro is better than the vivo NEX 3, getting an 83.4 score against 73.9. These phones have Android operating system, but the Motorola Edge 40 Pro has older 13 version and vivo NEX 3 has Android 9.0 Pie version. The Motorola Edge 40 Pro is a extremely newer cellphone, and it is also just a bit thinner and just a little bit lighter than vivo NEX 3.
Motorola Edge 40 Pro has just a bit better looking display than vivo NEX 3, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a quite higher amount of pixels in each screen inch and a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels. The vivo NEX 3 has a very superior processor than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have 8 cores.
Motorola Edge 40 Pro shoots a bit better pictures and videos than vivo NEX 3, because although it has a way worse resolution camera in the back, and they both have a F1.8 camera aperture, the Motorola Edge 40 Pro also counts with a much better 7680x4320 video resolution and a bigger back-facing camera sensor which gives a better image and video quality.
The Motorola Edge 40 Pro and vivo NEX 3 both feature very similar memory for applications, games, photos and videos, both of them have exactly the same internal memory. Motorola Edge 40 Pro features a little better battery lifetime than vivo NEX 3, because it has a 2% bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.