Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Motorola |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 14 |
| 2019-09-16 | 2024-04-16 |
| 6.59 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.35 x 2.85 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.71 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Glowing night | Black Beauty, Luxe Lavender, Moonlight Pearl and Vanilla Cream |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2256 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | P-OLED |
| 362 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.72 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.40 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro is better than the vivo NEX 3, having a overall score of 86.3 against 73.9. Motorola Edge 50 Pro's body is much newer, somewhat thinner and lighter than vivo NEX 3. These phones include Android OS (Operating System), but Motorola Edge 50 Pro has the older 14 version and vivo NEX 3 has Android 9.0 Pie version.
The vivo NEX 3 features a lot better hardware performance than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores. Motorola Edge 50 Pro has a brighter display than vivo NEX 3, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a slightly better 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution and a just a little higher pixel density.
Vivo NEX 3 takes a little bit better photographs and videos than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, because although it has a smaller camera sensor capturing less light and dull colors and a way tinier diafragm aperture which is not so good for low light images and videos, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same video resolution, the vivo NEX 3 also counts with a back camera with lot more mega-pixels.
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro has a much better memory capacity for games and applications than vivo NEX 3, because it has 512 GB internal storage capacity. Motorola Edge 50 Pro counts with a battery performance that is just as good as the battery performance in vivo NEX 3.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.