Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Motorola |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 14 |
| 2019-09-16 | 2024-04-16 |
| 6.59 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.71 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Glowing night | Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2256 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | P-OLED |
| 362 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.72 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has an overall score of 87.1, which is much better than the vivo NEX 3's overall score of 73.9. These phones include Android OS (operating system), but Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has 14 version and vivo NEX 3 has Android 9.0 Pie version. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra's body is a lot newer, a little bit lighter and just a bit thinner than the vivo NEX 3.
The vivo NEX 3 counts with a very superior processing power than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has 4 GB lesser RAM memory, they both have 8 processing cores. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a lot better looking display than vivo NEX 3, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a bit higher 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution and a little bit more pixels per inch in the display.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra shoots a little bit better videos and photos than vivo NEX 3, because although it has a lot less mega pixels back-facing camera and a worse video definition, it also counts with a bigger aperture to take better low light captures and videos and a way bigger sensor shooting much higher quality photographs.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a superior storage for games and applications than vivo NEX 3, because it has 512 GB internal memory capacity. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a battery duration that is very similar to the vivo NEX 3 one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.