Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Motorola |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-09-16 | 2020-04-16 |
| 6.59 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.29 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches |
| 7.71 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Glowing night | Smoke black |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | $ 150.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2256 x 1080 pixels | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 362 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Moto G Power is a bit better than the vivo NEX 3, having a overall score of 76.1 against 73.9. Both phones in this review work with Android OS, but Moto G Power has an older 11 version and vivo NEX 3 has Android 9.0 Pie. Although the Moto G Power and the vivo NEX 3 were released with only a couple months difference, Moto G Power's construction is a little lighter but also just a bit thicker.
Motorola Moto G Power has a screen that is very similar to the screen in vivo NEX 3, because although the Motorola Moto G Power has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a bit higher amount of pixels per inch of screen and a little bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2300px. The vivo NEX 3 counts with a bit superior processing unit than Moto G Power, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the vivo NEX 3 also has 4 GB more RAM memory.
The vivo NEX 3 has a greater memory for games and applications than Moto G Power, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with more internal memory capacity. Vivo NEX 3 captures way better videos and photos than Moto G Power, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not good for low light photography, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the vivo NEX 3 also counts with a lot bigger camera sensor shooting much better quality videos and pictures and a much higher resolution back-facing camera.
Motorola Moto G Power counts with a little longer battery life than vivo NEX 3, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.