Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 76 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Motorola |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 10 |
| 2019-09-16 | 2020-04-16 |
| 6.59 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.14 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches |
| 7.71 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Glowing night | Capri blue and Smoke black |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | $ 237.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2256 x 1080 pixels | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 362 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Moto G8 Power is a bit better than vivo NEX 3, having a 76 score against 73.9. Although the Moto G8 Power and vivo NEX 3 were only released 7 months apart, Moto G8 Power's body is a bit thicker but also just a little bit lighter than vivo NEX 3. Both devices in this comparison review work with Android operating system, but Moto G8 Power has an older 10 version while vivo NEX 3 has Android 9.0 Pie version.
Vivo NEX 3 has a little bit better performance than Moto G8 Power, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the vivo NEX 3 also has a larger amount of RAM. The Moto G8 Power and vivo NEX 3 both count with extremely similar displays, because although the Moto G8 Power has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2300 pixels and a little bit better pixel density.
The vivo NEX 3 counts with a very superior camera than Moto G8 Power, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not nice for low light photos and videos, and they both have the same video resolution and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the vivo NEX 3 also counts with a lot higher 64 megapixels resolution camera and a lot bigger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
Vivo NEX 3 features a better storage capacity to install applications and games than Moto G8 Power, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 192 GB more internal memory capacity. Moto G8 Power features just a bit longer battery performance than vivo NEX 3, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.